Above: image theme taken at: https://gr.pinterest.com/pin/344103227770120937/
Code & Sensibility, Sense & Codability: It's a new Dawn, It's a new Day, it's a new Life for Us. The problem is: are we Feeling Good?
We list bellow our top 10 questions regarding Artificial Intelligence (A.I.) not fully answered by A.I. experts, scientists, developers and avid supporters-or haters. The answers might simply not be there, or if they are, it might be difficult to express them with known tech terms or place them into existing theorems.
So let's explain by asking:
- As we are about to gallop from Narrow A.I (Weak A.I.) to General A.I. (Strong A.I.) in the following decades which actual professions, practised by humans will come to extinct first and eventually they will be replaced by A.I. mechanisms i.e. robots?
They are well argumented predictions for drivers, secretaries, translators, meta-data techies, diagnosticians, documentalists and on a next level security agents, curators, teachers, journalists and so on.
- In life-threatening conditions like poverty, war, desease or global crisis can superintelligence provide help or stopping these situations , before they reach a climax?
It is up to us - as long as we prevail in terms of intelligence on this planet -to create safety nets to stop malignancies of all kinds, and A.I. could facilitate and support that task. Or not.
- A.I. is turning evil or against us humans?
A.I. is not turning evil or sensible/conscious to some point, it just seems to have different orientation, a definite divergence compare to our objectives, right now.
- Can A.I. be 100% safe?
A.I. can be entirely safe, as long as we continue to implore about safety and impose research over that uncompromising issue, especially in the area of autonomous weapons.
- Which is the specific timespan in decades before we start having 75%-implemented A.I. in our daily lives?
Some say 2060, the truth is we simply don't know.
- What will be the response in child development and upbringing, after A.I.'s mass application?
Specialists in child development are extremely concerned about A.I. and many papers illustrate direct connection with autism. The capital point on this debate remains the career orientation though, during teenagehood, ex. in countries like Finland where the government is willing to re-examine the whole primary education system, in order to make it "future-friendly" and "job-accessible".
- How A.I. will affect - if so - the environment and global warming?
A.I. applications can certaily help regulate the current state of the planet, but there is no evidence for final solutions just yet.
- Is it possible our society adopting to a A.I. Eutopia quickly?
The idea of humans living a blissful life in the future, away from production while machines will perform all the daily tasks, plus providing economic growth - is most appealing, nevertheless many moons away from current social infrastructures, ethics and mindsets.
- If A.I. won't work for us, will it be possibly or easily reversible?
As the next "industrial" revolution, it will be as irreversible as the previous ones.
- Are we ready to use A.I., to confront A.I., or to merge with A.I.?
Let's ignore all three prossibilities and better start planning ahead. If we want to establish A.I. in our lives like another competence, another complete technological achievement meaning to benefit us, we better start engaging our local governments preparing the ground- therefore making it happen under all the possible prerequisites we desire. That will do.
Love & Robots?-))